or is there no fork in that tree?

Thanks to The Troglopundit .

Please enjoy the music while your constitution and country are destroyed from within. Thank you.

Today, I sent faxes to both of my Senators urging them to vote NAY on the appointment of Elena Kagan. I wrote of my opposition to her appointment at the end of June, and nothing has transpired to change my mind. In fact, I believe she has been, shall we say, less than forthcoming in her responses to Senate questioning.

The vote may be held as soon as tomorrow (Tuesday) even though one source I found hints at a delay. Now is not the time for us to delay, however. We must make our voices heard yet again.

Join me and many of my conservative brethren by sending faxes to your Senators urging them to vote against Kagan’s confirmation.

I used the Christian Coalition of America’s Fax Congress service, which cost $3.00 total.

More on Mizzzz Kagan’s radical, un-American views at Western Front America and NRO.


Image by Harvard Law Record via Flickr

What’s with the media all bemoaning the lack of intel on Elena Kagan?

Plenty of material is available to reinforce the position that Elena Kagan should be rejected from lifetime inclusion to the highest court in the land. It defies comprehension that I, a mere peon in the political arena, should feel obligated to point out the obvious insanity. But here we go again.

Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan has lied to the very court to which she is nominated, has in effect admitted she would be a judicial activist, has weakened the protection of defenseless unborn children and demonstrated her disregard for the protection of Free Speech.

With his nomination of Kagan, the Obamachine has once again attacked our liberties and shown a complete disdain for the constitution and rule of law. Kagan, the *hack* Harvard law *cough* expert has shown in her previous writings and recommendations that she is unworthy of the position to which she aspires.

From The Classic Liberal: Kagan lied to Supreme Court in 9/11 Case.

Teresamerica alerts us to an NRO expose’ on Kagan’s abysmal record on the rights of the unborn. While working as deputy assistant to the president for domestic policy in the Clinton administration she[?] made [then secret] suggestions as to the wording of the bill banning partial birth abortion, wording that was inserted verbatim into the supposedly scientific document that in effect watered down their scientific findings.  As Shannen W. Coffin, an attorney in Washington, D.C., who was the deputy assistant attorney general in charge of the defense of the federal Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act during the Bush administration writes at NRO:

Miss Kagan’s decision to override a scientific finding with her own calculated distortion in order to protect access to the most despicable of abortion procedures seriously twisted the judicial process.

Senators and Citizens alike should read the NRO article.

There is also recent evidence of Kagan’s stance on the First Amendment or rather the twisting of it to suit her desires. As Obama’s Solicitor General she:

argued that the government can imprison you for five years for passing out pamphlets that criticize candidates.

I wonder how Mizzz Kagan would characterize this robot’s opinion on her qualifications.

Mizzz Kagan, as a senior at Princeton, also authored a paper reflecting her longing for Socialism in America.

At Princeton, she wrote a senior thesis under historian Sean Wilentz titled “To the Final Conflict: Socialism in New York City, 1900-1933”, studying the socialist movement in New York City in the early 20th century. In it she wrote, “Through its own internal feuding, then, the SP exhausted itself forever….The story is a sad but also a chastening one for those who, more than half a century after socialism’s decline, still wish to change America.”[11] ~ Wikipedia

All this information and more was available to Barack Hussein Obama prior to his nominating the androgynous Mizzz Kagan, and is also alarming in the contex of the recent 5 to 4 Supreme Court decision to uphold the Second Amendment. Yes. You read that correctly, the SCOTUS recently was asked to rule on local encroachment of the right of an individual to bear arms and defend his life and property and it squeaked by with one vote! What I also find disturbing in the ruling is that they defined/refined the right as personal protection, and not protection from an out of control government hell bent on dominating the American people, which I see as original intent along with personal protection, but then, I’m no lawyer and that lawyer speak is Klingon to me.

You can read some other excellent opinions of the SC’s Second Amendment ruling from Nicki at Washington Rebel and from Matt at Conservative Hideout.

Elections have consequences folks. Remember in November.

Also, don’t forget to say a prayer for Mosab Yousef today.


Subscribe via email
December 2022