Terrorism

No, I’m not talking about Obama or Pelosi.

Some email humor:

The first is purported to be from Jeff Foxworthy but I think he could have done most of them better.

I’ve revised it slightly as an instructional tool for the TSA.

——————————————————-

If you refine heroin for a living, but you have a moral objection to liquor…

You may be an Islamic Terrorist.

If you own a $3,000 machine gun and $5,000 rocket launcher, but you can’t afford shoes..

You may be a Islamic Terrorist.

If you have more wives than teeth…

You may be a Islamic Terrorist.

If you wipe your butt with your bare hand, but consider bacon unclean…

You may be a Islamic Terrorist.

If you think vests come in two styles: bullet-proof and suicide…

You may be a Islamic Terrorist.

If you can’t think of anyone you haven’t declared Jihad against…

You may be a Islamic Terrorist.

If you consider television dangerous, but routinely carry explosives in your clothing…

You may be a Islamic Terrorist.

If you were amazed to discover that cell phones have uses other than setting off roadside bombs…

You may be a Islamic Terrorist.

If you have nothing against women and think every man should own at least four…

You may be a Islamic Terrorist.

If your cousin is president of the United States …

You may be a Islamic Terrorist.

———————-

Blonde Joke:

Last year I replaced all the windows in my house with that expensive double-panel energy efficient kind, and today, I got a call from the contractor who installed them. He was complaining that the work had been completed a whole year ago and I still hadn’t paid for them.
Hellloooo …just because I’m blonde doesn’t mean that I am automatically stupid.

So, I told him just what his fast talking sales guy had told me last year, that in ONE YEAR these windows would pay for themselves!

Helllooooo? It’s been a year! I told him. There was only silence at the other end of the line, so I finally just hung up.

He never called back. I bet he felt like an idiot.

Share the love:
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Fark
  • FriendFeed
  • StumbleUpon
  • LinkedIn
  • Print
  • Posterous
  • Propeller
  • Technorati
  • Tumblr
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MisterWong
  • RSS
  • Add to favorites

From Alec Rawls at Error Theory:
Blogburst logo, petitionAlan Keyes, logo-size

Conservative hero Alan Keyes is asking whether there is a pattern of submission surrounding the nation’s 9/11 sites. Apparently he has seen our video expose of Islamic and terrorist memorializing features in the crescent memorial to Flight 93 (now called a broken circle). Like any straight-thinker, he doesn’t like what he sees. The Flight 93 crash site is no place for a giant Islamic-shaped crescent, no matter what it is called.

On this point, Keyes cites Colorado Representative Tom Tancredo’s 2005 objection to the newly unveiled Crescent of Embrace design:

Back in 2005, then-Rep. Tom Tancredo was reported to have sent a letter to the National Park Service “asking the Interior Department to reconsider the crescent-shaped design of the memorial to those aboard a plane hijacked on Sept. 11, 2001, because some may think it honors the terrorists.” Tancredo quite sensibly argues that “regardless of whether ‘the invocation of a Muslim Symbol’ was intentional, ‘it seems that such a symbol is unsuitable for paying appropriate tribute to the heroes of Flight 93 or the ensuing American struggle against radical Islam.’”

Keyes notes our claim that the design is still replete with terrorist memorializing features and he seems to find it credible. Why shouldn’t he? The damning features are all right there in architect Paul Murdoch’s design drawings. Thank you Doctor Keyes!

“It’s not just embarrassing. It is a dangerous willful blindness, spurning the woken vigilance of Flight 93.”

That’s the last line of the full-page advertisement that Tom Burnett Senior and Alec Rawls will be running in the Somerset Daily American this Friday and Saturday (when the two first ladies will be in town for the 9/11 anniversary):

It_was-terrible_9-11-10_x250px
Click for legible image. Full ad-copy PDF here (large file warning).

We are hoping that visitors will hold onto our ad, maybe even tape it to their car windows, and most especially, show it to any press people they come across. Hey, if the Park Service can use 9/11 to plant the world’s largest mosque on the Flight 93 crash site, we can use 9/11 to object.

To join our blogburst against the crescent mosque, just send your blog’s url.

Share the love:
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Fark
  • FriendFeed
  • StumbleUpon
  • LinkedIn
  • Print
  • Posterous
  • Propeller
  • Technorati
  • Tumblr
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MisterWong
  • RSS
  • Add to favorites

George Will, in Jerusalem for the Washington Post, quotes Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu:

Today’s Middle East, he says, reflects two developments. One is the rise of Iran and militant Islam since the 1979 revolution, which led to al-Qaeda, Hamas and Hezbollah. The other development is the multiplying threat of missile warfare.

Now Israel faces a third threat, the campaign to delegitimize it in order to extinguish its capacity for self-defense. After two uniquely perilous millennia for Jews, the creation of Israel meant, Netanyahu says, “the capacity for self-defense restored to the Jewish people.” But note, he says, the reflexive worldwide chorus of condemnation when Israel responded with force to rocket barrages from Gaza and from southern Lebanon. There is, he believes, a crystallizing consensus that “Israel is not allowed to exercise self-defense.”

And yesterday, former US Envoy to the UN, John Bolton said Israel has just a few days to act before Iran begins inserting fuel rods into it’s newly built nuke-you-lar reactor.

Israel has only mere days to launch an attack on Iran’s Bushehr nuclear reactor if Russia makes good on its plan to deliver fuel there this weekend, former US ambassador to the UN John Bolton warned Tuesday.

He said that once Russia has loaded the fuel into the reactor — slated for Saturday – Israel would no longer be willing to strike for fear of triggering widespread radiation in an attack.

Iran in effect is hiding behind human shields while it continues to arm itself with nuclear capabilities:

Iran, for its part, dismissed talk of a possible Israel strike.

On Tuesday, Foreign Ministry spokesman Ramin Mehmanparast was quoted as saying that “these threats of attacks had become repetitive and lost their meaning.” He also reportedly told correspondents in Tehran, “According to international law, installations which have real fuel cannot be attacked because of the humanitarian consequences.”

The rhetoric comes as the US increased sanctions on Iran as part of its ongoing efforts to ratchet up pressure on Tehran.

On Tuesday the US Treasury announced dozens of additional names of Iranian banks and individuals that fall under sanctions law.

So, while the Iranians continue to ratchet up their ability to attack our Israeli allies, our President and State department continue to run a racket of sanctions and weak diplomacy designed to look the other way while Israel is forced to defend itself alone.

Question:

Should we strike Iranian nuclear facilities before they load fuel into their reactor or complete their ability to enrich weapons grade plutonium?

Should Israel?

I believe we should and if we don’t strike first, we should at the very least provide backing forces to Israel when they do so. A nuclear Iran would be more emboldened to act out against our Israeli allies, just as any of the lesser factions surrounding them because of Iran’s implied nuclear umbrella of protection. We cannot allow this scenario to develop.

Will President Obama see the issue this way?

I’d doubt he has a pair. In fact, his previous actions suggest that he’ll use an Israeli strike as a reason to sanction or condemn Israel.

That would be a tragedy of unthinkable proportions.

Share the love:
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Fark
  • FriendFeed
  • StumbleUpon
  • LinkedIn
  • Print
  • Posterous
  • Propeller
  • Technorati
  • Tumblr
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MisterWong
  • RSS
  • Add to favorites

From The Northern Echo UK:

On line fight for British ex para’s release escalates as he is sent back to Afghan prison cell after failed court hearing

THOUSANDS of members of an on line support group are intensifying their fight to have a Teesside serviceman released from an Afghan jail after he was refused his freedom by the Afghan authorities at a court hearing. Anthony Malone 37, an ex paratrooper from Billingham is being held in Pul-i-Charkhi prison in Afghanistan for allegedly owing thousands of dollars.

These barbarians want nothing more than ransom money. Let’s let this soldier and his family know that we are aware of and support Anthony Malone’s cause.

To his credit, Malone is steadily demanding that no money be paid for his release.

“Anthony is a man of principle and insists on his innocence. He wants to leave Pul-i-Charkhi as a freeman with his name cleared.”

Read the rest of the article.

Sign the petition and join the Facebook page!

Our president may not be much in the way of treating our British allies with the dignity and respect they deserve, but we can at least show that the American people won’t abandon them.

HT Flying War Pigs

Share the love:
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Fark
  • FriendFeed
  • StumbleUpon
  • LinkedIn
  • Print
  • Posterous
  • Propeller
  • Technorati
  • Tumblr
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MisterWong
  • RSS
  • Add to favorites

Pamela Geller, who is leading the fight against the ground zero mosque in New York, has posted the following letter from Tom Burnett Senior.

To our fellow 9/11 families and to all who are concerned about the Ground Zero mega-mosque in New York:

We want everyone to know that the Park Service is right now building an even larger Islamic victory mosque atop the Flight 93 crash site. Many of you were outraged in 2005 when the Crescent of Embrace design was unveiled to be a half-mile wide Islamic shaped crescent:

Crescent publicity shot and Islamic crescent and star
Left: 2005 publicity shot of the Crescent of Embrace design. Right: typical Islamic crescent and star, viewed from a similar angle.

Few people know that this giant crescent actually points to Mecca, or understand the religious significance of this orientation. A crescent that points the direction to Mecca is a very familiar construct in the Islamic world. Because Muslims face Mecca for prayer, every mosque is built around a Mecca direction indicator called a mihrab. The classic mihrab is crescent shaped. Here are the two most famous mihrabs in the world:

Crescent publicity shot and Islamic crescent and star
Left: the Mihrab of the Prophet, at the Prophet’s mosque in Medina. Right: the mihrab of the Great Mosque in Cordoba Spain.

Face into the crescent to face Mecca

As with the Medina and Cordoba mihrabs, a person facing into the Crescent of Embrace will be facing Mecca. In the image below, superimposed red lines show the orientation of the Flight 93 crescent. The green qibla circle is from an online Mecca-direction calculator:

60%SizeMeccaOrientationGraphic
A person standing between the tips of the crescent and facing into the center of the crescent (red arrow) will be facing almost exactly in “qibla” direction (the Muslim prayer direction). You can verify the qibla direction from Somerset PA using any number of on-line Mecca-direction calculators.

To be precise, the Crescent of Embrace points 1.8° north of Mecca, ± a tenth of a degree. The final construction drawings alter this orientation slightly, so that instead of pointing a little less than two degrees north of Mecca, the actual crescent will point less than three degrees south of Mecca. Such small deviations from Mecca are insignificant by Islamic standards, which developed over a period of more than a thousand years during which far flung Muslims had no accurate way to determine the direction to Mecca.

The Park Service does not call the Crescent of Embrace a crescent anymore. Now they call it Circle of Embrace, but the only actual change was to add an extra arc of trees (planted to the rear of a person facing into the giant crescent) that explicitly represents a broken off part of the circle. The unbroken part of the circle, what symbolically remains standing in the wake of 9/11, is just the original Crescent of Embrace. It is still a giant Islamic shaped crescent, still pointing at Mecca.

This is the Park Service’s official explanation for the design: the terrorist attacks are depicted as smashing our peaceful circle and turning it into a giant crescent. A clearer depiction of Islamic victory is hard to imagine, so no one should be too surprised that the damned thing points to Mecca, and actually turns out to be a mosque.

Other mosque features

Mosque design is based on a dozen typical mosque features, every one of which is realized in the Crescent/Circle design, all on the same epic scale as the half mile wide crescent-mihrab. Note, for instance, that the 93 foot tall minaret-like Tower of Voices is topped with another Islamic-shaped crescent, akin to the crescent-topped minarets seen in many Islamic countries:

60%SizeMeccaOrientationGraphic
An Islamic shaped crescent, soaring in the sky above the symbolic lives of the 40 heroes, which literally dangle down below. In Islam, there is only heaven and hell. Symbolic damnation?

The Flight 93 mosque needs to be stopped, along with the Islamic victory mosque at ground zero in Manhattan. May the fight against these two desecrations strengthen each other.

Sincerely,

Tom Burnett Senior
Loving father of Flight 93 hero Tom Burnett Junior

Pamela’s Atlas Shrugs post includes a second letter from Mr. Burnett, thanking her for her help and passing on some information about the design selection process. (The vote for was 9 to 6 from a judging panel where family members were outnumbered 8-7 by left wing design professionals.)

Want to join our blogburst against the crescent mosque?

Just send your blog’s url.

There is also an online petition that people can sign.

Contact information for the Flight 93 Memorial Project here.

Ten Gallon Hat Tip to Nice Deb

Share the love:
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Fark
  • FriendFeed
  • StumbleUpon
  • LinkedIn
  • Print
  • Posterous
  • Propeller
  • Technorati
  • Tumblr
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MisterWong
  • RSS
  • Add to favorites

Wow. It seems like everybody who’s anybody is talking about this. No Sheeples Here has a post on it and I heard about it from Obi’s Sister.

It’s being reported that 17 Afghan soldiers here for training are loose in the US, and have been for about 2 years or less and we are just now hearing of it. The reports are somewhat vague as to the duration of individual cases although I might infer that they have been filtering out into the population in small numbers.

Some are questioning why the reports are only being released now. Fox News quotes an unnamed senior law enforcement official:

“Although we are vigilant and need to work toward not allowing this to happen,” the official said, this alert should “not necessarily” be described as “a national security threat, more of a ‘hey these guys violated our laws and we need to find them.’”

OK sport, maybe you could look for about 12 million or so illegal immigrants while you’re at it. Both cases are quite similar with the exception that we transported these possible terrorists here at taxpayer expense. I hear we have some neat new detention facilities in which to house these guys, should they ever be caught. They could learn basket weaving with the rest of  ‘em.

I can tell you the first place I would look for these guys, it’s a place that they would fit right in, never to be noticed.

The Obama Administration.

Glenn Beck sent out an email on it earlier today and Fox also has some info, including the names and Memeorandum has more info along with Scared Monkeys, The Jawa Report, Weasel Zippers, Confederate Yankee, Atlas Shrugs, Liberty Pundits Blog, Patterico’s Pontifications and And So it Goes in Shreveport

Another question, why don’t they post the photos? Are they afraid someone might recognize one of them? Am I supposed to go up to random Afghan looking dude and ask “Hey, aren’t you… *picks out random name from list* Mohammad Nasim Fateh Zada, born 12/4/1966?” I can’t even pronounce it. Besides, that would be racial profiling, wouldn’t it?

As Obi’s Sister says, “What could go wrong?”

Share the love:
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Fark
  • FriendFeed
  • StumbleUpon
  • LinkedIn
  • Print
  • Posterous
  • Propeller
  • Technorati
  • Tumblr
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MisterWong
  • RSS
  • Add to favorites

Anyone Still Wondering Where This PC Bullshit Is Going Better Take A Look  At Britain.

Via twitter friend JihadHunter some disturbing images and a story to wake up the drowsy, that is if you want to be awakened at all. If not, sorry ’bout your bad luck.

From the UK Daily Mail:

Screaming hate and brandishing vile placards, Muslim extremists and far-Right groups clashed yesterday in ugly scenes that marred a parade by soldiers.

Around 40 members of a group called Muslims Against the Crusades (MAC) arrived with inflammatory banners featuring slogans such as ‘Butchers return’ and ‘What are you dying for? £18k’.

Now the good news. Some of our English brethren are tired of the BS as well:

They were soon confronted by 100 people, some wearing English Defence League T-shirts, who shouted ‘scum’ and ‘Muslim bombers off our streets’.


Thank God for anyone willing to stand up to this vile attempt at defaming defenders of freedom. Who do these idiots think protect their right to protest in the first place?
Read the full story at The Daily Mail.co.uk
Share the love:
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Fark
  • FriendFeed
  • StumbleUpon
  • LinkedIn
  • Print
  • Posterous
  • Propeller
  • Technorati
  • Tumblr
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MisterWong
  • RSS
  • Add to favorites

Via Atlas Shrugs:

Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Aboul Gheit said he had a one-on-one meeting with Obama, in which President Obama told him that he was still a Muslim, the son of a Muslim father, the stepson of Muslim stepfather, that his half brothers in Kenya are Muslims, and that he was sympathetic towards the Muslim agenda.

I’m shocked SHOCKED I TELL YOU!

Pamela Geller has the rest of the story, and as one might expect, an avalanche of background data.

UPDATE: Donald Douglas at American Power picks up the story along with Memeorandum, Another Black Conservative, Doug Ross and The Right Scoop.

Share the love:
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Fark
  • FriendFeed
  • StumbleUpon
  • LinkedIn
  • Print
  • Posterous
  • Propeller
  • Technorati
  • Tumblr
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MisterWong
  • RSS
  • Add to favorites

Governor Patrick, your pod is ready. Any coincidence he’s from Chicago? Maybe that’s where they moved Area 51.
Ever see the movie “Invasion of the Body Snatchers” or “They Live”? It’s like these politicians think that nothing will happen to them, if only they cooperate and sell us down the river…

H/T BW via email

Share the love:
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Fark
  • FriendFeed
  • StumbleUpon
  • LinkedIn
  • Print
  • Posterous
  • Propeller
  • Technorati
  • Tumblr
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MisterWong
  • RSS
  • Add to favorites
#tcot
Valour IT 2011

 

Robo-Tees!

Robo-Love!
Day by Day Cartoon
Site Meter
The Resistance
twitter widget
Categories
WSJ
Larwyn’s Linx
Boycott the New York Times -- Read the Real News at Larwyn's Linx
Pre Dot Com (Old Site)
These are the Archives you're looking for...
Past Featured Blogs

Featured Blog

Subscribe via email
Follow the ‘Bot!
Facebook Twitter or email me at robot [at] mindnumbedrobot [dot] com
 
July 2011
M T W T F S S
« Jun    
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031