Archive for October 2011

Bill Whittle dismantles the Progressives’ (Marxist/Socialist/Statist’s) convoluted interpretation of a “living constitution.”

Video after the page break:

From Jared Law at The 9.12 Project:

The so-called ‘National Popular Vote’ movement is, indeed, a threat to the electoral college, a wise, inspired system our Founding Fathers set up to help provide yet another firewall to a dictator taking control of America before we had a chance to react. California has already completed the process to flip the bird at the Founding Fathers and the Constitution.

Phyllis Schlafly:

A plot is afoot to change our constitutional form of government by ditching the Electoral College. John Anderson, Birch Bayh and John Buchanan, three losers who were defeated in the 1980 Reagan landslide, are scheming to change our Constitution without complying with the amendment process.

Our Constitution requires that a president be elected by a majority of votes in the Electoral College, with each state’s vote weighted based on its population. But some who took an oath to defend our Constitution are plotting to undermine its essential structure by a compact among as few as eleven of the most populous states.

The plan of this Campaign for the National Popular Vote (NPV) is to get states with at least 270 votes in the Electoral College to enact identical bills requiring their own electors to ignore the winner of their state’s election and cast all their state’s ballots for the candidate who the state believes received more popular votes than the other candidates nationwide, even if he fails to win a majority of the popular vote.

Read the whole thing. Then, contact your state and national senators and representatives. If they sneak this through, we will lose the republic.

UPDATE:

Just saw this from Professor Jacobson at Legal Insurrection:

National Popular Vote debacle looming

Trog has a great idea about who to include on that list before he’ll agree to submit to such a test.

But let’s think about this for a moment.

The libertarian in me says we need less intrusion, not more, but I understand the premise: people on the government dole should be held to the same standard as their benefactors.

We tax payers  are the 53% so by default we are their (the people on welfare and or food stamps) employers. It’s a shame their job description is so undemanding, really. It’s actually non-existent if you think about it, aside from a set-up appointment and a few phone calls the monetary benefits far out-way the miniscule effort/reward ratio. And really, who can resist government cheese? Certainly not the entire class of people the left has trained to suckle the government teat over the last 50 years. So, I’m in agreement, in principle.

But as long as we’re tossing around ideas…

Let’s require drug tests for Congress and all public employees

by randomly chosen, non-union labs,

or no tests at all.

For anyone

except by the requirements of their employer and even then they should be performance driven.

The point is, Congress should be subject to every condition and requirement for employment they legislate upon the people they supposedly serve. That goes for public employees as well.

That’s not asking too much, is it?

 

H/T Breitbart.tv

Lest you think I’m being too harsh with the “moron” description, behold the products of a Marxist/Socialist education system as they deny civil rights hero Rep John Lewis the opportunity to speak in Atlanta.

These people give mind-numbed robots a bad name.

H/T KTRH Houston’s Michael Berry

More from Big Government:

The Email Archive of the #OccupyWallStreet Movement: Anarchists, Socialists, Unions, Democrats and Their Plans

UPDATE:

Occupy Wall Street Hatred, Violence, and Antisemitism Compilation

Nazis and Communists Throw Their Support Behind Occupy Wall Street Movements

Frances Fox Piven Leads Bizzare Chant at Occupy DC Rally (Video)

F*CK The USA: Is This What 99% of Americans Support?

Video: OWS meltdown star a Columbia grad student … with a trust fund

Unions back Occupy Wall Street movement

Occupy Wall Street Protests Go Global, Turn Violent in Rome

Capitalist Confronts #OccupyLA

$3.6 Million from Soros Backs ‘Occupy Wall Street’, Media Ignore or Downplay Connection

Occupy Wall Street protesters have amassed $230,000 and supplies

Seduced by the Dark Side of the Force

Police Hospitalized After Obama OWS Riots Turn Violent

Shameful: Uniformed Coast Guard Member Spat On By #OccupyBoston Protesters

OWS vs. Tea Parties, as seen through the media prism

Now they want to #OccupyJudaism

List of the richest Hollywood moonbats who are supporting the Occupy Wall Street movement

#NewTone: Occupy Wall Street Flea-baggers Now Issuing Public Death Threats

Occupy LA Attendee Calls for Violent Revolution, Philadelphia Protesters Deny Deaths Caused by Communism

Frances Fox Piven Indoctrinating College Students To Be Ready For Violent Street Battles

Rush: Obama Setting Up Country For Riots

Conservatives Support Boston Needy Who Were Harmed By #OccupyBoston

An illustrated guide: The homes Kamp Alinsky Kids won’t protest

Obama political adviser linked to Occupy Wall Street protests

Shocker: Drugs And Criminals Join #OWS

#OccupyWallStreet Weenies Get No Love From Schlichter

Occupy Denver Protester: Hang and shoot Bush and the thirteen families that own the world

Lisa Fithian: #Occupy Organizer, Union Educator–And Israel-Hater

Obama Tears Down His Own Wall Street

Obama Uses MLK Dedication To Sell #OccupyWallStreet And Vow He’s Not Done Transforming America Into A Marxist State

More updates to come.

At least that’s my take on Vanderleun’s excellent piece titled The People of the Mud, which explores the psychology of those useful idiots populating the Occupy Wall Street crowd. Or would the proper description be pathology?

A small sample:

“Yearning for the mud” in America is a compulsion that comes over people when they have, for complex reasons, a need to immerse themselves in self-degradation. It’s usually a mix of drink, drugs, and weird sex until the soul is obliterated by the abused flesh. Why? Hard to say but it is often the case that, when they look at themselves, they can’t stand what they see.

This obliteration of the soul and the abuse of the flesh is one of the central tenets in many of our post-modern, secular lifestyle religions. For them the “signo” of “In hoc signo vinces” is the full body tattoo project, an earlobe plug, and the multiple facial piercings with a coke nail as an accessory.

Most people try some of these things for a time in their youth, but soon grow out of it when age and experience get the upper hand. Others grow out of it via deep psychoanalysis and a few trips to the rehab clinic. Still others are simply killed by it, their lives bracketed by dates that are far too close together.

Many, however, never kick this yearning for the mud and were, in the past, thought of as “perverts” but are now more kindly seen as “differently minded.” Seeking the safety of number they now live in those urban sinkholes of the soul they laud as “enclaves of Alternative Lifestyles.”

Please do take the time to read the whole thing.

And pray for those afflicted souls who wallow in such an amoral state.

Having experienced what Vanderleun describes while pursuing the rock and roll lifestyle, his words hold a truthful resonance to me. The youths in OWS simply want to be part of a larger movement, to feel like they contributed to “something.” Unfortunately, their professors have sold them snake oil in the form of a wrongful cause. Heck, most of them have no idea why they are there except for the party and the debauchery, utterly clueless as to how they are being co-opted and used by the very government they should be protesting in the first place.

Note to OWS: If you want to have a TEA Party, you can still join ours. But please, be sure to bathe and clean up after yourself. We don’t leave our protests in a state of disarray, in case you haven’t noticed.

The People of the Mud will now be added to the Prime page.

I clicked play.

 

Could.   Not.    Stop.   Alien.   Hand.

Damn you, Trog.  Damn you!

Now it’s stuck in RAM.

Quick. Find some Foo Fighters.

Ahhh, now that’s more like it.

 

BTW, Zilla’s got a baad toothache and needs some tip jar action. How about helping her feel better? You’ll feel better too. Thanks!

Readers of this blog know that I believe Obama is a stealth Muslim. I still believe it to be true, even though some recent events such as the deaths of Osama bin Laden, Alawar al Alaki and many other top level terrorists would seem to contradict such an opinion. Later, I will propose a scenario where both truths could be possible.

There are also a growing number of people coming to at least suspect Obama to be a Manchurian President. Given his handling of Middle East policy of ignoring or actively supporting militant Islamic groups while simultaneously denigrating our Israeli allies, I must agree that the Manchurian President theory is not just possible, it is highly probable and as such, must be considered. My aim here is to take these possibilities to the ugliest possible conclusion, because if even remotely true, it would have catastrophic consequences for freedom loving peoples the world over. It would also be the Mother of All Conspiracies.

Liar!

It is known that Islam allows and in some cases encourages its followers to lie to unbelievers in order to achieve the goal of world dominance and submission to the faith. This is called Taqiyya – Saying something that isn’t true,” or another form which is Kitman – Lying by omission.” ~ This brings up a question in my mind secondary to the theory I am proposing: What kind of god allows and encourages his followers to engage in deceit? A false god, that’s who, one who is completely contrary to the one true God of the Jews and of the Christians, who encourages truth and calls lying a sin, but I digress.

The stated goal of Islam is to convert all non-believers to the faith or enslave them to their theocratic rule through Sharia law and ultimately establish a Caliphate with a Caliph, or single high priest, who will rule over the entire world under the authority of Allah and establish world domination of their religion.

 Jihad is the Way [The 1995 book by Mustafa Mashhur, who headed the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt from 1996-2002.] explicitly endorses the reinstatement of a worldwide Islamic regime.

“It should be known that jihad and preparation towards jihad are not only for the purpose of fending off assaults and attacks of Allah’s enemies from Muslims, but are also for the purpose of realizing the great task of establishing an Islamic state and strengthening the religion and spreading it around the world.”

 The Theory:

Obama wants to be the Caliph

 Usurper!

Regarding the Middle East and the Arab Uprisings, the Obama administration has done nothing to discourage, and everything to encourage unrest and in many cases helped promote anti-American interests to power in Tunisia, Egypt and Lebanon. At the same time, Yemin and many other Middle Eastern countries have seen bloody protests funded by and instigated by the Muslim Brotherhood while Obama ignores the uprising in Iran against the Ahmadinejad regime, a sworn enemy of the United States. Why would Obama promote unrest by his indecisive behavior or in some cases, support Muslim Brotherhood activity with US military forces in Libya while ignoring obvious pro-democratic uprisings in Iran? I think the answer is obvious. He wants to promote the Islamic religion and ultimately the worldwide Caliphate theocracy. Think that is an outrageous accusation? Tell it to the Pakistani government minister who called for Obama to claim the title of Caliph.

Assassin!

 Osama bin Laden, Al Qaeda’s second in command Atiyah Abd Al-Rahman and a host of top terrorists have been killed during Obama’s presidency, which prompted ABC’s Jake Tapper to remark:

Remember when Rudy Giuliani warned that electing Barack Obama would mean that the U.S. played defense, not offense, against the terrorists?

If this is defense, what does offense look like?

Just last week American born terrorist Alawar al Alaki is taken out by American forces under the command of Barack Hussein Obama. Taken at face value, one could assume that Obama ordered these killings; however, the opposite could be true. As in the case of bin Laden, our military was on target long before Obama was even aware of the fact and actually had no choice but to sign off on the killing lest he be painted as aiding and abetting the enemy. Speculatively, the same scenario could have transpired for Al Rahman, al Alaki and the others. Our forces could have been on target and it would just plain look bad if the president told them to stand down.

Traitor-in-Chief!

If Obama is in fact engaging in Taqiyya or Kitman, then he would betray his Muslim identity by expressing regret or remorse at the deaths of his allies. If we take it one step farther, (here comes the overactive imagination), Obama could, in fact, be engaging in a double-cross against his Muslim brothers; He could claim plausible deniability in these killings while deftly using his position as president to take out any candidates or would-be contenders to himself becoming the Caliph. He is in the perfect place from which to carry this out, probably the only place from which it can be done: The White House.

 Going a bit farther still, the idea of using his position to eliminate his rivals may not have occurred to Obama until bin Laden was taken out or even later, but the possibility is still a viable one. Perhaps narcissist Obama is now recognizing other advantages to being leader of the country he despises.

Caliph?

If this theory is correct, I think Obama will eventually remove Ahmadinejad, who I believe sees himself as the rightful Caliph, but the timing is not right, especially since Ahmadinejad presents a threat to the US that he can use in the future to bolster Obama’s image as a decisive leader – perhaps a war with Iran or another assassination in the days, weeks or months leading up to the 2012 election?

Outré

Obviously, I’m not sure about any of this. Who could be except Obama himself?  I’m just trying to make sense of what Obama is doing and increasingly, in my mind, the evidence points to Obama’s malicious destruction of America as a necessary step in a larger plan – and that should trouble us all.

For Liberty ~ ’bot

-

UPDATE: Linked by Doug Ross -  Thanks!

Thanks to Zilla of the Resistance for her assistance in researching this piece.

References linked in this post: – Updated

The Terrorist Notches on Obama’s Belt

Egypt now fears Obama a ‘Manchurian President’ – ‘They are trying to understand why he is acting against U.S. interests’

Obama’s Pretend Counterterrorism Policy

Borderline Treachery – Obama proposes leaving Israel indefensible.

Lying (Taqiyya and Kitman)

Ex-Muslim reveals secret goal of Islam – Cites behavior of ‘moderate,’ ‘peaceful’ members of faith

Related – Updated

How many terrorists does Obama HAVE to Kill?

Obama, the Taliban, and the Muslim Brotherhood Vs. America, Israel, and Freedom

Radical Islam Infiltrates Federal Government

Anwar Al-Awlaki – ???

CAIR, Hamas, the Muslim Brotherhood and various other radical Islamic organizations are influencing key policy decisions and intelligence gathering capabilities from within our federal government at the highest levels.

Bill Whittle interviews a few insiders.

Video after the page break:

Daniel Miller Money Bomb!
Robo-Twitter Feed
Now Reading…
Day by Day Cartoon
Site Meter
Categories
WSJ
Larwyn’s Linx
Boycott the New York Times -- Read the Real News at Larwyn's Linx
Pre Dot Com (Old Site)
These are the Archives you're looking for...
 
October 2011
M T W T F S S
« Sep   Nov »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  
Subscribe via email
Follow the ‘Bot!
Facebook Follow mnrobot on Twitter or email me at robot [at] mindnumbedrobot [dot] com
Robo-Love!