They will side with anyone or anything in their quest for more control, even if it means partnering with known enemies. I mean, I know the left are all about the free love thing but câ€™mon, the Muslim Brotherhood? Really? Do they actually know who theyâ€™re in bed with? Do they even care? What about that whole â€˜separation of church and stateâ€™ mantra they like to throw around at parties? Isnâ€™t embracing Islam in the White House a bit of hypocrisy?
I gotta warn you though; those beer goggles can be a bit of a bummer in the morning, especially when you find out you went to bed with a ten and woke up with a two that wants to chop your head off.
Iâ€™ve said before that I believe Obama to be a muslim. He’s said so himself. It is also a known fact that islam allows and even encourages muslims to be deceitful in order to infiltrate and convert their enemies so, for him to lie to achieve his aim of the submission of America to islam is not inconsistent with his religion.
Does anyone else see a double standard here? What kind of god encourages its followers to be untruthful, for any reason? Shouldnâ€™t a righteous god insist his followers be above reproach in everything, above all,Â proselytizing?
My God does.
9. Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour.
islam’s sanctioning of deceit is just another example of the false prophet mohammed and his false god allah and their false, barbaric religion of blasphemy against the one true God of Abraham.
John Quincy Adams, the sixth President of the United States, knew of islamâ€™s barbaric nature perhaps better than we. As noted by Dave Miller, Ph.D. in his article for Apologetics Press titled â€œJohn Quincy Adams on Islam,â€ he states:
No Christian would deny that many Christians in history have violated the precepts of Christ by mistreating others and even committing atrocities in the name of Christ. However, Adams rightly observes that one must go against Christian doctrine to do so. Not so with Islamâ€”since violence is sanctioned:
The fundamental doctrine of the Christian religion, is the extirpation of hatred from the human heart. It forbids the exercise of it, even towards enemies. There is no denomination of Christians, which denies or misunderstands this doctrine. All understand it alikeâ€”all acknowledge its obligations; and however imperfectly, in the purposes of Divine Providence, its efficacy has been shown in the practice of Christians, it has not been wholly inoperative upon them. Its effect has been upon the manners of nations. It has mitigated the horrors of warâ€”it has softened the features of slaveryâ€”it has humanized the intercourse of social life. The unqualified acknowledgement of a duty does not, indeed, suffice to insure its performance. Hatred is yet a passion, but too powerful upon the hearts of Christians. Yet they cannot indulge it, except by the sacrifice of their principles, and the conscious violation of their duties. No state paper from a Christian hand, could, without trampling the precepts of its Lord and Master, have commenced by an open proclamation of hatred to any portion of the human race. The Ottoman lays it down as the foundation of his discourse (Blunt, 29:300, emp. added).
The Founders were forthright in their assessment of the nature and teachings of Islam and the Quran. Americans and their political leaders would do well to take a sober look at history. To fail to do so will be catastrophic.
So, howâ€™s that whole dhimmitude thing workinâ€™ out for ya?
Also, lest you think I’m being unfair and unbalanced, Zilla of the Resistance has posted an outstanding piece on the islamic infiltration of the conservative movement.
Side note: The blogroll just got it’s first “Z” entry.
Hey Barry, if Gaddafi is endorsing you, you know you’re on the wrong side.
Tulsa police captain in flap over Islamic invitation files lawsuit – Woman Honor Thyself
Thanks to Frank for sharing these in the comments.
UPDATE: I made a revision for clarity. So there.